Things can only get better. That, or the world collapses
by Jack Stilgoe
Anyroad, we seem to be fine. Given that the LHC is designed specifically to explore the boundaries of our uncertainty, though, I can't help but sympathise with some of the NGO's arguments. We are in a world of incalculable uncertainty, where a whole bunch of claims and possibilities are up for grabs.
When we were doing the Nanodialogues project, one of our participants took a strong precautionary stance towards new technologies. We were talking about previous experiments like this:
"They didn’t know for sure that it wouldn’t rip the whole planet apart. They didn’t know. They were taking an atom apart, taking the energy, that thing that holds everything together, that force that holds all of this together. But to rip that open the first time, they didn’t actually know that it just wouldn’t chain react forever and tear the whole fucking place to pieces. They didn’t ask us about it, did they? They didn’t go, “Well, what do you all think about this?” They just went all ahead and did it."
There's a lot to be said for going ahead and doing it. But we still don't really have any modes of governance - beyond crossing our fingers - for some of these more exciting areas of science.
mathEW HADLEY
There was no wind, no covert landing of malicious aliens - on that night of November 15th, in 1988. During its normal operation (while studying gravitational lenses and distant galaxies), the scientific colossus suddenly folded up in a tangled heap around the control building... amazingly, according to this info, no scientist inside of it was hurt.
----------------
mathew
<a href=”http://www.drivenwide.com”>Internet marketing</a>
Robert Sharp
Christ, can you imagine how monumentally embarrassing that would be for humanity if we anhiliated ourselves in that way. "A tale told by an idiot" and no mistake.