Mick Hume
Win a fitness package worth more than £3,000
Say what you like about the nanny state, but I do think it's a bit much when the Prime Minister takes it upon himself to make our new year's resolutions for us.
In his message to mark the 60th year of the NHS, Gordon Brown resolves that we will all live healthier lives — stop smoking, drink less, exercise more. As a reward, the health service will still treat us should our personal regime inexplicably fail and we fall sick. This generous offer is to be made in a patient's contract spelling out “the rights and responsibilities associated with entitlement to NHS care”.
Some protest that this could mean smokers or the obese being denied healthcare. But such “ethical rationing” is already happening. Mr Brown's plans for a more “personal and preventative service” involve a bigger risk to us all. They mark the next step in an unhealthy trend, begun under Margaret Thatcher and accelerated under Tony Blair, to make it a role of the NHS to send people to the Naughty Habits Step.
Where the “old-fashioned” health service merely treated the sick, today's NHS seeks to beat well people into shape as clean-living citizens through advice and guidance. As Michael Fitzpatrick, an East London GP, observed when such contracts were first proposed, they involve “a major shift of general practice away from the treatment of patients who are ill towards the regulation of the lifestyles of the population”.
Despite this being the age of “evidence-based” medicine, nobody can provide proof that such government drives to alter behaviour improve public health. Yet the authorities press on regardless, seeking a magical cure for an ailing political class that hopes to reconnect with people around “ishoos” of personal health. Politicians who have no clue how to change society for the better are reduced to cajoling us to sort ourselves out.
These unwieldy plans can only further undermine the efficiency of the health system, the role of doctors as clinical professionals — and most importantly, the autonomy of individuals. They turn the purpose of healthcare on its head. As René Dubos wrote in 1960, “it is part of the doctor's function to make it possible for his patients to go on doing the pleasant things that are bad for them — smoking too much, eating and drinking too much — without killing themselves any sooner than is necessary”. There must be more to life than healthy living. Amid the talk of rights and responsibilities, one that gets ignored is the individual's right to make the “wrong” choices.
The other fact often missed out is that we already live longer, healthier lives than ever before. So why not leave us alone to enjoy it?
Modern clinical care is capable of wonders, and the health service should stick to that. How about an alternative, informal contract for the 60th anniversary of the NHS: we promise to come to you when we are sick, if you will pledge only to try to cure what ails us.

Mick Hume is Britain's only self-confessed libertarian Marxist newspaper columnist. His Notebook column appears on Fridays, and he also writes a weekly Thunderer column. He is also editor-at-large of spiked-online.com. which he launched as the online descendant of Living Marxism magazine. Hume is an ex-grammar school boy from Woking with a season ticket at Manchester United who lives in London
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2006
£10,750
Great car insurance deals online
£Excellent+ executive benefits
Torres and Partners
London
£49,229 - £62,035 pro rata
Charity Commission
London/Liverpool/Taunton
Alstom Power
Europe
Six Figure
Rolls Royce
Midlands/Europe
From £89,950
Great Investment, River Views
Special Offers now available
New Year in the USA!
.
Cruise the Islands of Hawaii - Pride of America
List your property with two leading travel websites
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths
News International associated websites: Globrix | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
We shouldn't do this because it will save the NHS money - as Jonathan Bagley points out, living to 90 will probably cost the taxpayer more than dying at 65. We should do it because all our citizens deserve to make the best of life, and not have an unnecessarily illness-ridden life.
And active promotion of health, rather than just patching up people when they fall ill, might also help us sort out some of the health inequalities that produce a 20 year gap in life expectancy between residents of neighbouring areas.
"ethical " rationing is happening nowhere that I know of . Maybe you mean effectiveness-based rationing where doctors won't operate until someone stops smoking or loses weight because these things materially affect the patient's chances of recovering - but this is not the same as denying treatment because they disapprove of their lifestyle choices.
andy, glasgow,
Well said Mick, spot on as usual.
James, Ross-on-Wye, England
The "costs the NHS/taxpayer" argument contains a fatal flaw: everyone eventually dies. Is a death from smoking-induced lung cancer or heart attack more expensive than 2 years rattling with pills and wetting the carpet of a nursing home? But that is not the end of it. On average we each pay for, and therefore consume, health care at the rate of £1500 per year - £120,000 over an 80 year life time. Dying at 70 rather than 80 saves £50,000 in state pension costs and smoking 20 a day for 40 years raises over £45,000 in tobacco duty - money which, if spent on other things, would not go to the exchequer. It is no wonder that many of us despise politics and politicians. They are evidently either charlatons or idiots. Your choice Gordon?
Jonathan Bagley, Todmorden, uk
If someone repeatedly, deliberately chops their finger off, for how long must the public purse cover the cost of re-attachment? If someone simply will not stop drinking, should the NHS keep providing liver transplants? Unless you answer "yes" to these questions, you must acknowledge that some connection exists between an individual's behaviour and the healthcare that they should receive. Therefore, rational debate about rationing is necessary, and it has to entail a consideration of patients' own responsibilities.
Nick, Rotherham, UK
We are all far too obsessed with enjoying ourselves, often at the expense of our liberty and health -preconditions of a more lasting happiness. I never thought I would see a government that used 24 hour drinking as a method of getting over voter apathy, a political technique more a home in the Roman Empire. Ironically the u-turn on health and personal accountability is probably more about denying healthcare than promoting health.
Dr Andrew Papanikitas, Oxford,
So true and so timely. But politics today is all about bullying, with single-issue fanatics using every trick to force us to think and act as they think we should.
Tim, London,
I thought I paid taxes, particularly national insurance in return for the NHS. If treatment can be withheld on spurious grounds, taxes will be.
Peter Dunford, Bournemouth, UK