Edge_of_violence_project_banner

Re-examining the relationship between violent and non-violent extremism.

Since 9/11, we face a new type of security challenge - violent radicalism associated with Islam. The al-Qaeda (inspired) network has challenged received wisdom: it is a global terror network with the unswerving aim to deliver maximum destruction to the West, one that understands the importance of symbolism and ideas.

The dynamics of al-Qaeda and inspired groups make it especially challenging; authorities must move seamlessly from the global to the local, must fill large gaps in their knowledge about Islam and the Islamic world, and maintain a delicate balance between operational interventions and long-term relationship-building.

The task is difficult because al-Qaeda's growth coincides with a wider but very diverse movement of Muslim mobilisation in Europe, some highly radical (some violent, some non-violent), and anxiety has been heightened by unease about the growing visibility of Islam in Europe

Some commentators welcome the emergence of radical mobilisation as a positive sign of Muslim integration. Others view it as a danger to the stability of Europe or a trend towards separatism. Most agree that factors including socio-economic, crises of identity, international travel and communication, integration, immigration, foreign policy, and media portrayal are key to this phenomenon.

It is critical that counter-terrorism strategies address these broader concerns, as well as the specific challenges posed by the terrorists. Despite European experience of terrorism, there is insufficient understanding of how different factions and types of mobilisations relate to one another.

The project will consider these issues primarily in the context of Canada, but also in the UK, France, the Netherlands, and Denmark. 
The project will:

 

  • ·         Map and document the Muslim community infrastructure (formal and informal) in Canada, the UK, France, Netherlands and Denmark, including violent, non-violent radical, representative bodies and local community organisations.
  • ·         Compare and contrast the ways in which local dynamics and factors / including socio-economic, nature/extent of integration, length of settlement, political discourse, media portrayal of Muslims, and government strategies for engagement with Muslim communities / impact on the types of mobilisation taking place within Muslim communities in Canada, the UK, France, Netherlands and Denmark, especially the balance between political, radical and violent radical mobilisation.
  • ·         Provide insights into the implications for policy makers in Canada primarily, but that will also have relevance for policy makers working in counter-terrorism, policing, tackling violent extremism, de-radicalisation, immigration, and community cohesion in other countries.

 

 

Jan 25

A very British weapon

Jamie Bartlett says that satire should be the weapon of choice against terrorism.

Jan 19

Not what you say, but the way you say it

Jamie Bartlett looks at accents as a signal of legitimacy in Islam.

Jan 12

The opposite of dampening radicalisation

Jonathan Birdwell argues that banning Islam4UK will strengthen, not break radical groups.

Jul 9

The Turban Effect?

I've got an article on Comment is free which you can read here.  The article draws...

Nov 9

Podcast: Community Based Counter-Terrorism

So, apparently the police are watching 2,000 terror suspects, but they aren’t the...