<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>

		<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
		
		<channel>
		
			<title>Demos Project : Private Lives?</title>
			
			<link>http://www.demos.co.uk/projects/privatelives/</link>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
			<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 07:55:41 -0100</pubDate>
						
			<description>Latest items from Private Lives? on http://www.demos.co.uk/ - the thinktank for everyday democracy</description>
			

			
			<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 07:55:41 -0100</lastBuildDate>


			
		
		
		
		
	
	<item>
		<title>Global privacy standards?</title>
		<link>http://www.demos.co.uk/items/10334</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Data and information about us, for reasons fair, foul or just opaque, travels across nations and continents as an almost necessary by-product of whatever it is that we call the information society. But how can we be sure about what that means for who sees that personal information, and how it is used?Google&amp;apos;s Peter Fleischer is talking about this today in a speech at a UNESCO conference on ethics and human rights in the information society. He&amp;apos;s arguing that we should develop some global... ( from BlogPosts )]]></description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.demos.co.uk/items/10334</guid>
		<content:encoded>
		
			<![CDATA[Data and information about us, for reasons fair, foul or just opaque, travels across nations and continents as an almost necessary by-product of whatever it is that we call the information society. But how can we be sure about what that means for who sees that personal information, and how it is used?<br /><br />Google's Peter Fleischer is <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2007/sep/14/news.google">talking about this</a> today in a speech at a <a href="http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=39365&amp;URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&amp;URL_SECTION=201.html">UNESCO conference</a> on ethics and human rights in the information society. He's arguing that we should develop some global privacy standards that can help us manage in this complex international environment for personal information. Who should be responsible for it? Would countries retain the right to set their own standards? Where would accountabiltiy lie?<br /><br />It's an interesting set of problems from the perspective of a an information handler with some compelling challenges on their hands. The speech will be part of our forthcoming <a href="http://www.demos.co.uk/projects/privatelives/overview">collection of essays on privacy,</a> to be published in early November.]]>
		
		</content:encoded>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 14:51:33 -0100</pubDate>
		<author>peter.bradwell@demos.co.uk ( Pete Bradwell )</author>
		
		
		
	</item>
	
	 	
		
		
	
	<item>
		<title>Privacy on social networks</title>
		<link>http://www.demos.co.uk/items/9956</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Just read a story about Oxford University using Facebook to find evidence from their students&amp;apos; photos of banned post-exam partying. It follows lots of stories about employers using infomration they find on social network sites to inform their recrutiment decisions, or monitor their staff.One of Facebook&amp;apos;s selling points is that users can set levels of privacy, limiting access to photos and the other snippets of information from their profiles to a specific group or groups.&amp;nbsp; Is it as... ( from BlogPosts )]]></description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.demos.co.uk/items/9956</guid>
		<content:encoded>
		
			<![CDATA[Just read a <a href="http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech_and_web/the_web/article2087306.ece">story</a> about Oxford University using Facebook to find evidence from their students' photos of banned post-exam partying. It follows lots of stories about employers using information they find on social network sites to inform their recrutiment decisions, or monitor their staff.<br /><br />One of Facebook's selling points is that users can set levels of privacy, limiting access to photos and the other snippets of information from their profiles to a specific group or groups.&nbsp; Is it as unethical to actively try to transgress those boundaries on social networks, as it is looking at someone's email, or getting hold of a set of their printed photos?<br /><br /><span style="text-decoration: underline;"></span>Does the question of who sees what come down to <a href="http://www.facebook.com/terms.php">ownership</a> of <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/07/16/social_networking_profiles_company_property/">your</a> <a href="http://dydan.rutgers.edu/about.html">profile</a>, as much as <a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20060407-6553.html">what</a> you decide to put on it?]]>
		
		</content:encoded>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 07:28:01 -0100</pubDate>
		<author>peter.bradwell@demos.co.uk ( Pete Bradwell )</author>
		
		
		
	</item>
	
	 	
		
		
	
	<item>
		<title>Search me...</title>
		<link>http://www.demos.co.uk/items/9846</link>
		<description><![CDATA[We&amp;apos;re holding an event with Google next Thursday evening at their offices in Victoria. We&amp;apos;ll be talking about what&amp;apos;s happening to privacy online.The discussion should touch on some really timely challenges and opportunities. As we do more and more online, large amounts of information about us is created and captured. Much of that underpins the spirit of coolaboration and openness of online life. But what are the implications for the rich values that our sense of privacy embodies? ( from BlogPosts )]]></description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.demos.co.uk/items/9846</guid>
		<content:encoded>
		
			<![CDATA[We're holding an <a href="http://www.demos.co.uk/events/searchmewhatshappeningtoprivacyonline">event</a> with Google next Thursday evening at their offices in Victoria.&nbsp; We'll be talking about what's happening to privacy online.<br /><br />Our director <a href="http://www.demos.co.uk/people/catherinefieschi">Catherine Fieschi</a> will be chairing the discussion, with <a href="http://www.peterfleischer.blogspot.com/">Peter Fleischer</a>, Google's global privacy counsel, joined by a panel featuring <a href="http://people.oii.ox.ac.uk/dutton/">William Dutton</a>, Director of the Oxford Internet Institute and <a href="http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/global/bobbie_johnson.html">Bobbie Johnson</a>, Guardian's technology correspondent.<br /><br />We're pretty excited, as the event will touch on some really timely challenges and opportunities that we think are really important.&nbsp; As we do more and more online, large amounts of information about us is created and captured.&nbsp; Much of that underpins the spirit of coolaboration and openness of online life.<br /><br />But are there limits to who sees that information and what they can do with it?&nbsp; What are the implications of online life for the rich values that our sense of privacy embodies?<br /><br />It should be a fascinating discussion and ties in closely with our ongoing work on <a href="http://www.demos.co.uk/projects/privatelives/overview">privacy</a> and the politics of <a href="http://www.demos.co.uk/projects/foryourinformation/overview">personal information sharing</a>.<br /><br />The event is free but space is limited.&nbsp; If you would like to attend please write to <a href="mailto:demos_fyi@demos.co.uk?subject=Demos%20/%20Google%20privacy%20event">demos_fyi@demos.co.uk</a>.]]>
		
		</content:encoded>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 16:03:57 -0100</pubDate>
		<author>peter.bradwell@demos.co.uk ( Pete Bradwell )</author>
		
		
		
	</item>
	
	 	
		
		
	
	<item>
		<title>Search me: What&amp;apos;s happening to privacy online?</title>
		<link>http://www.demos.co.uk/items/9845</link>
		<description><![CDATA[As the internet becomes more integrated into our everyday lives, the issue of privacy becomes ever more important. With the amount of information online increasing through ever expanding uses of technology, what is the right approach to protecting the privacy of users?In the context of Demos&amp;amp;rsquo; ongoing work on privacy and information sharing, this event will explore the implications of these developments for the privacy of the individual. It will ask what the opportunities and challenges are in an era where our online behaviour and relationships are more important than ever. ( from BlogPosts )]]></description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.demos.co.uk/items/9845</guid>
		<content:encoded>
		
			<![CDATA[Google and Demos are holding a discussion about online privacy, with:<br /><ul>    <li><span style="font-weight: bold;">Peter Fleischer</span>, Global Privacy Counsel for Google<span style="font-weight: bold;"></span></li>    <li><span style="font-weight: bold;">Catherine Fieschi</span>, Director of Demos, Chair<span style="font-weight: bold;"></span></li>    <li><span style="font-weight: bold;">Bobbie Johnson</span>, Deputy Editor, TechnologyGuardian</li>    <li><span style="font-weight: bold;">William Dutton, </span>Director, Oxford Internet Institute</li></ul><span style="font-weight: bold;">July 5th 2007, 6pm &ndash; 8pm</span>, Google offices, Victoria.<br /><br />As the internet becomes more integrated into our everyday lives, the issue of privacy becomes ever more important. With the amount of information online increasing through ever expanding uses of technology, what is the right approach to protecting the privacy of users?&nbsp;&nbsp; <br /><br />In the context of Demos&rsquo; ongoing work on privacy and information sharing, this event will explore the implications of these developments for the privacy of the individual. It will ask what the opportunities and challenges are in an era where our online behaviour and relationships are more important than ever.<br />&nbsp;<br />Peter Fleischer will be joined by an expert panel to assess the social and political implications of a changing privacy landscape, and map the new boundaries and relationships that constitute our privacy.<br /><br />We do hope you can join us for what will be a thought-provoking and in-depth discussion.<br /><br />The event is free but space is limited; if you would like to attend please write to <span style="font-weight: bold;">demos_fyi@demos.co.uk</span>, or call 0207 367 6331.]]>
		
		</content:encoded>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 14:42:27 -0100</pubDate>
		
		
		
		
	</item>
	
	 	
		
		
	
	<item>
		<title>Rate my privacy</title>
		<link>http://www.demos.co.uk/items/9732</link>
		<description><![CDATA[A really useful report from Privacy International - rankings of the major internet companies based on an assessment of their attitudes and practices with regard to their users privacy.It gets its hands dirty at the point where the sharing of information online - and the promises we hear about collaboration and involvement - strike against the protection of information about us and our habits.&amp;nbsp; Great to see policy and practice laid out like this. ( from BlogPosts )]]></description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.demos.co.uk/items/9732</guid>
		<content:encoded>
		
			<![CDATA[A really useful <a href="http://www.privacyinternational.org/article.shtml?cmd[347]=x-347-553961">report</a> from <a href="http://www.privacyinternational.org">Privacy International</a> - rankings of the major internet companies based on an assessment of their attitudes and practices with regard to their users privacy.<br /><br />It gets its hands dirty at the point where the sharing of information online - and the promises we hear about collaboration and involvement - strike against the protection of information about us and our habits.&nbsp; Great to see policy and practice laid out like this, whether you agree with the findings or not.&nbsp; As they say when outlining why they undertook the study:<br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">We felt that consumers want to know about these surveillance practices so that they can make a better-informed decision about how, whether and with whom they should share their personal information. We also believe that companies need to be more open about how they process information and why it is processed.<br /><br /></span>That really chimes with what we're trying to do with For Your Information - tell that accessible story and articulate the broad context within which these dramatic changes are taking place.<span style="font-style: italic;"><br /></span><br />The report has caused a bit of <a href="http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2007/06/google_fails_pr.html">stir</a> - Google are named dead last, with the report suggesting that it has an apathetic attitude and lax approach to the sucurity and integrity of people's personal information.&nbsp; The story is that Google responded by suggesting that Privacy International has a conflict of interest as one of its board works for Microsoft.&nbsp; Director Simon Davies' response is <a href="http://www.privacyinternational.org/article.shtml?cmd[347]=x-347-553964">here</a>, and well worth a read!]]>
		
		</content:encoded>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 19:04:54 -0100</pubDate>
		<author>peter.bradwell@demos.co.uk ( Pete Bradwell )</author>
		
		
		
	</item>
	
	 	
	</channel>	 	
</rss>