<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>

		<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
		
		<channel>
		
			<title>Demos Project : Bringing it Home</title>
			
			<link>http://www.demos.co.uk/projects/tacklingthenewterrorthreat/</link>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
			<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 22:59:45 -0100</pubDate>
						
			<description>Latest items from Bringing it Home on http://www.demos.co.uk/ - the thinktank for everyday democracy</description>
			

			
			<lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 22:59:45 -0100</lastBuildDate>


			
		
		
		
		
	
	<item>
		<title>Understanding Political Islam: Trends and Perspectives</title>
		<link>http://www.demos.co.uk/items/12102</link>
		<description><![CDATA[This two-day specialist conference will be held as an invitation-only event at Islam Expo, the largest Muslim cultural event in Europe. The aim is to open the way for a transparent and challenging discussion of a complex phenomenon which has been the subject of much attention but insufficiently objective and sophisticated analysis. ( from BlogPosts )]]></description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.demos.co.uk/items/12102</guid>
		<content:encoded>
		
			<![CDATA[<a href="mailto:bmievents@googlemail.com">  </a><div><span lang="EN-GB">The panel will include:<o:p></o:p></span></div><div><strong><span lang="EN-GB">Robert Lambert</span></strong><span lang="EN-GB">, Research Fellow, <st1:place u1:st="on"><st1:placetype u1:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on"><st1:placetype w:st="on">University</st1:placetype></st1:place>  of <st1:placename u1:st="on"><st1:placename w:st="on">Exeter</st1:placename></st1:placename></st1:placetype></st1:place>; co-founder and<u2:p></u2:p><o:p></o:p></span></div><div><span lang="EN-GB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<span style="">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style=""> </span>former head of the Metropolitan Police Muslim <br /></span></div><div><span lang="EN-GB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Contact Unit<u2:p></u2:p><o:p></o:p></span></div><div><strong><span lang="EN-GB">Anas Altikriti</span></strong><span lang="EN-GB">, President, The <st1:city u1:st="on"><st1:place u1:st="on"><st1:city w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Cordoba</st1:place></st1:city></st1:place></st1:city> Foundation<u2:p></u2:p><o:p></o:p></span></div><div><strong><span lang="EN-GB">Dr. Robert Leiken</span></strong><span lang="EN-GB">, Director of the Immigration and National Security<u2:p></u2:p><o:p></o:p></span></div><div><span lang="EN-GB"><span style="">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span><span style="">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; </span>Program, The <st1:place u1:st="on"><st1:placename u1:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on"><st1:placename w:st="on">Nixon</st1:placename></st1:place> <st1:placetype u1:st="on"><st1:placetype w:st="on">Center</st1:placetype></st1:placetype><u2:p></u2:p></st1:placename></st1:place><o:p></o:p></span></div><div><strong><span lang="EN-GB">Dr. Tahir Abbas, </span></strong><span lang="EN-GB">Director of the Centre for the Study of Ethnicity and<u2:p></u2:p><o:p></o:p></span></div><div><span lang="EN-GB"><span style="">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span><span style="">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span>Culture, <st1:place u1:st="on"><st1:placetype u1:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on"><st1:placetype w:st="on">University</st1:placetype></st1:place>  of <st1:placename u1:st="on"><st1:placename w:st="on">Birmingham</st1:placename></st1:placename></st1:placetype></st1:place><o:p></o:p></span></div><div><u2:p></u2:p></div><div><span lang="EN-GB"><u2:p>&nbsp;</u2:p><strong>Jamie Bartlett, </strong>(chair) Demos</span></div><p class="MsoNormal">  </p><p style="" class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB"><br /></span></p><p style="" class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">The British Muslim Initiative - together with Demos, the Al Jazeera Centre for Studies, Conflicts Forum, Forward Thinking and The Cordoba Foundation &ndash; is organising a seminar on Understanding Political Islam, to take place on 12-13 July 2008 in <st1:city u1:st="on"><st1:place u1:st="on"><st1:city w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">London</st1:place></st1:city></st1:place></st1:city>.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p style="" class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB"><u2:p>&nbsp;</u2:p><br /></span></p><p style="" class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">Islamists have risen to prominence in the last two decades across the <st1:place u1:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Middle East</st1:place></st1:place> and much of the Muslim world. Today, Islamism is an undeniable fact of the political and cultural life of most Muslim countries in Asia and Africa, and even among Muslim minorities in Europe and the <st1:country-region u1:st="on"><st1:place u1:st="on"><st1:country-region w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">United States</st1:place></st1:country-region></st1:place></st1:country-region>. Although much attention has been directed to the violent and radical forms of Islamism - particularly since the 9/11 terrorist attacks-, its more peaceful, mainstream manifestations continue to be largely overlooked. There has been little effort to grasp this socio-political phenomenon and comprehend its complexities. The need for a deep and coherent understanding of this important and highly complex movement has never been greater.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p style="" class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB"><u2:p><br /></u2:p></span></p><p style="" class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB"><u2:p>This two-day specialist conference will be held as an invitation-only event at Islam Expo, the largest Muslim cultural event in <st1:place u1:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Europe</st1:place></st1:place>. The aim is to open the way for a transparent and challenging discussion of a complex phenomenon which has been the subject of much attention but insufficiently objective and sophisticated analysis.<o:p></o:p></u2:p></span></p><p style="" class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB"><br /></span></p><div><p><span lang="EN-GB">To attend, or find out more, please e-mail </span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: Garamond;"><a href="mailto:bmievents@googlemail.com">bmievents@googlemail.com</a></span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: Garamond;"><a href="mailto:bmievents@googlemail.com"></a></span><span lang="EN-GB"><o:p></o:p></span></p></div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB"><o:p></o:p></span></p><a href="mailto:bmievents@googlemail.com"><span lang="EN-GB"><o:p></o:p></span></a>]]>
		
		</content:encoded>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 14:41:01 -0100</pubDate>
		
		
		
		
	</item>
	
	 	
		
		
	
	<item>
		<title>Hollow Victory?</title>
		<link>http://www.demos.co.uk/items/11986</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week&amp;amp;rsquo;s resignation by David Davis was described by politicians and pundits alike as a great political stunt, while Davis himself was subjected to some mild heckling for being a an egotistical *&amp;amp;amp;%&amp;amp;pound;$ and a madman. Gordon Brown described the whole event as a farce. But two days is a long time in the news cycle and the week-end saw newspapers running an altogether more positive story. Why so? Because on the issue of 42 days David Davis is right. ( from BlogPosts )]]></description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.demos.co.uk/items/11986</guid>
		<content:encoded>
		
			<![CDATA[Last week&rsquo;s <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7450627.stm">resignation by David Davis</a> was described by politicians and pundits alike as a great political stunt, while Davis himself was subjected to some mild heckling for being a an <span style="font-style: italic;">egotistical *&amp;%&pound;$ </span>and a <span style="font-style: italic;">madman</span>. Gordon Brown described the whole event as a farce. But two days is a long time in the news cycle and the week-end saw newspapers running an altogether more positive story.&nbsp; Why so? Because on the issue of 42 days David Davis is right.<br /><br />From <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2008/jun/15/labour.daviddavis1">The Observer :</a><br /><span style="font-style: italic;"><br />When a battle-weary David Davis got off the train home on Friday night, the condemnation of his colleagues ringing in his ears, he headed to his local pub for solace. His aides were waiting, with a sheaf of emails they stuffed straight into his hands. They came from excited Tory activists, life-long Labour voters, ordinary people who had never written to politicians before: there was an offer of help from a Lib Dem constituency chairman and pledges of cash from pensioners. But one, he admits, gave him 'a lump in the throat': it was from a woman who worked on a local government project to encourage the alienated and unfranchised to vote. What he had done, she wrote, would 'make my job so much easier'.</span><br /><br />While Westminster ruminates on the implications of Davis&rsquo; resignation (unlikely to return to front bench politics, never stand for the leadership again) the reason for his resignation has been largely absent from the story. However it&rsquo;s worth pointing some interesting facts from last week.<br /><br />First the DUP didn&rsquo;t swing the vote. As <a href="http://www.revolts.co.uk/">Revolts</a> shows the government did a remarkable job dampening down discontent on its own benches.<br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">Of the 49 Labour backbenchers who voted against the Government in November 2005, when they went down to defeat on the Terrorism Bill, only 29 did so today. Perhaps even more strikingly, of the 48 backbenchers who the whips had identified as noes &ndash; in a list leaked to a Sunday paper back in April, just 25 voted against the government. And note this: of the 39 backbenchers who the whips had down as wavering then, just seven voted against the government.</span><br style="font-style: italic;" /><br />Second, a core narrative of the 42 day saga was the importance of Labour looking tough on terrorism and in the process making the Conservatives look soft and huggable. Ministers, for example, took pleasure in highlighting the fact that <span style="font-weight: bold;">65 percent of the public</span> backed the government on 42 days but get this: the same poll shows that the public <span style="font-weight: bold;">still think that the Tories have the tougher policies</span> to deal with terrorism. And what&rsquo;s more Brown&rsquo;s own poll rating took a drubbing because of the vote.&nbsp;&nbsp; <br /><br />Third the measure remains a long way from enactment. The House of Lords will certainly vote the measure down which means we are in for a game of Palace ping pong in the coming months,&nbsp; interspersed by Davis&rsquo; own campaign. <br /><br />Is Davis a martyr or the spokesman for a new populist movement? Only time will tell.]]>
		
		</content:encoded>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 13:17:29 -0100</pubDate>
		<author>charlie[dot]edwards@demos[dot]co[dot]uk ( Charlie Edwards )</author>
		
		
		
	</item>
	
	 	
		
		
	
	<item>
		<title>Bringing It Home Launch</title>
		<link>http://www.demos.co.uk/items/8090</link>
		<description><![CDATA[This event will launch the culmination of 12 months research by Demos on community-based approaches to counter-terrorism. ( from BlogPosts )]]></description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.demos.co.uk/items/8090</guid>
		<content:encoded>
		
			<![CDATA[<p><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Speakers</span>: <br /><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">John Denham MP </span>(Chair of the Home Affairs Select Committee)<br /><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Assistant Chief Constable Rob Beckley </span>(ACPO lead on communities and counter-terrorism) <br /><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Abdul Haqq Baker </span>(Chairman of Brixton Mosque)<br /><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Azad Ali</span> (Chair of the Muslim Safety Forum) <br /><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Shareefa Fulat</span> (Director of the Muslim Youth Helpline)<br /><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Professor Tariq Ramadan</span> (Senior Research Fellow, St Antony&rsquo;s College, Oxford)</p><p><strong>Salma Yaqoob</strong> (Birmingham City Council)<br /><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Dilwar Hussain</span> (Head of the Policy Research Unit, the Islamic Foundation based in Leicester).<br /><br />This event launches the Bringing it Home pamphlet by Rachel Briggs, Dr Catherine Fieschi and Hannah Lownsbrough. <br /><br />It argues that we need to put communities at the heart of our approaches to counter-terrorism for four reasons. First, they offer important sources of information and intelligence. Second, communities picking up these signs are best placed to act pre-emptively to divert their young people from extremism. Third, while the state must also play a role, communities must take the lead in tackling problems which either create grievances or hinder their ability to organise, such as poverty, poor educational and employment attainment, and the paucity of effective leadership and representation. Finally, the police and security service cannot act without the consent of the communities they are there to protect. Security is delivered though consent and never through force, arguing that Muslims should tolerate inconveniences for the greater good, fails to understand this.&nbsp; <br /><br />The report is the culmination of a 12 month research project looking to identify effective ways of tackling home grown terrorism through the active engagement of Muslim communities. It involved research in London, Leicester, Leeds and Birmingham, over 100 interviews with Muslim community members, local police, community officials and national policy makers, and a conference at Wilton Park in March. The research has been supported by ACPO, DCLG, ESRC and AHRC<br /><br />This event is by invitation only but for more information or a copy of the report please email <a href="mailto:bringingithome@demos.co.uk">bringingithome@demos.co.uk&nbsp;</a></p>]]>
		
		</content:encoded>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 15:09:55 -0100</pubDate>
		
		
		
		
	</item>
	
	 	
		
		
	
	<item>
		<title>Wilton Park conference</title>
		<link>http://www.demos.co.uk/items/7534</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Demos participated in a conference at Wilton Park in March &amp;quot;Towards a Community-based approach to counter-terrorism.&amp;quot; Download a copy of the conference report (pdf).&amp;nbsp; ( from BlogPosts )]]></description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.demos.co.uk/items/7534</guid>
		<content:encoded>
		
			<![CDATA[<p><span class="projectdescription"><span lang="EN-GB">Demos participated in a conference at Wilton Park in March &quot;Towards a Community-based approach to counter-terrorism.&quot; <a href="http://www.wiltonpark.org.uk/documents/conferences/WPS06-5/pdfs/WPS06-5.pdf">Download a copy of the conference report</a> (pdf).&nbsp;<a href="http://www.wiltonpark.org.uk/documents/conferences/WPS06-5/pdfs/WPS06-5.pdf" /></span></span></p>]]>
		
		</content:encoded>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 15:10:28 -0100</pubDate>
		
		
		
		
	</item>
	
	 	
		
		
	
	<item>
		<title>Winning hearts and minds in the next 24 hours critical</title>
		<link>http://www.demos.co.uk/items/7379</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday we hosted a speech by the Home Secretary, who called for greater partnership in tackling terrorism. 24 hours later, his words have a new relevance. I have just written an article for the Guardian arguing that John Reid now needs to put those words into practice. You can read it here.In 24 hours time Muslims will gather for Friday prayers, when they will digest what has happened and what it could mean for them. The government and police need to ensure&amp;nbsp;talk of partnership doesn&amp;apos;t... ( from BlogPosts )]]></description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.demos.co.uk/items/7379</guid>
		<content:encoded>
		
			<![CDATA[<p>Yesterday we hosted a speech by the Home Secretary, who called for greater partnership in tackling terrorism. 24 hours later, his words have a new relevance. </p><p>I have just written an article for the Guardian arguing that John Reid now needs to put those words into practice. You can read it <a href="http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/rachel_briggs/2006/08/the_heat_of_the_moment.html">here</a>.</p><p>In 24 hours time Muslims will gather for Friday prayers, when they will digest what has happened and what it could mean for them. The government and police need to ensure&nbsp;talk of partnership doesn't get swept to one side in the heat of the moment. They have a small window of opportunity to show they really ARE serious about it and that the lessons of Forest Gate have been learned.</p>]]>
		
		</content:encoded>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 14:05:50 -0100</pubDate>
		<author>rachel_a_briggs@hotmail.co.uk ( Rachel Briggs )</author>
		
		
		
	</item>
	
	 	
		
		
	
	<item>
		<title>Getting tougher on terrorism, tougher on the causes of terrorism?...</title>
		<link>http://www.demos.co.uk/items/6993</link>
		<description><![CDATA[From the other side of the Atlantic, we instinctively feel that the US has totally over-reacted to the threat of terror. Sitting in my hotel room just around the corner from the White House, and after scores of discussions about the Bush administration&amp;apos;s record in this area, this instinct seems pretty spot on. What&amp;apos;s more, I&amp;apos;m sure that the security at Heathrow on Thursday morning will remind me that we are not far behind that ourselves. ( from BlogPosts )]]></description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.demos.co.uk/items/6993</guid>
		<content:encoded>
		
			<![CDATA[From the other side of the Atlantic, we instinctively feel that the US has totally over-reacted to the threat of terror. Sitting in my hotel room just around the corner from the White House, and after scores of discussions about the Bush administration's record in this area, this instinct seems pretty spot on. What's more, I'm sure that the security at Heathrow on Thursday morning will remind me that we are not far behind that ourselves. <br /><br />I've been wondering about whether the current reaction is really any different from what has gone before it. Isn't it all just history repeating itself?...<br /><br />Today I met well known Brookings scholar, Jeremy Shapiro. His view was that goverments always overreact to terrorism because it takes them by surprise and fundamentally challenges their legitimacy as states. From 9/11 and 7/7 to ETA, the IRA, and the Red Brigade in the 1970s, Shapiro says that governments always overreact at first in an attempt to reassert their control on the situation. They might also do this to buy themselves valuable time to work out what to do next. <br /><br />Over time they reassess, realise that civil liberties are the cornerstone of security, not its arch enemy (yawn, yawn), work out the importance of community engagement, and stumble their way towards some kind of peaceful conclusion. <br /><br />But in an age of globalisation, where the power and legitimacy of nation states is being brought into question by all sorts of new forces (not just terrorism), I am starting to wonder whether the overreaction we are seeing now is considerably more intense than that which we have seen in the past, even just 10 years ago. And if so, whether this might herald an entirely new phase in politics and the relationship between citizen and state.<br /><br />According to Shapiro, the overreaction is to be expected. But, as his theory goes, the curve falls off once the government realises the error of its ways and gets better at catching the bad guys.<br /><br />But if you buy into Briggs' armchair analsis, the changed global political environment, the continuing sense of uncertainty and the difficulty of the task ahead might just mean that the curve doesn't tail off. For both practical and political reasons, governments will no longer be able to let go of the security agenda and as a result it will become one of the big political issues to dominate the next generation. The balance between civil liberties and security will not bounce back and and be righted by common sense. <br /><br />If this is the case, we can't wait for the pendulom to swing - because it might not happen for another generation. We need to articulate a new and progressive story about security that has at its heart the marriage of civil liberties and personal and collective securities. It is not a fuzzy leftist compromise on security - we are not talking third way here. But if the left can't find a convincing way to push the pendulum back we might be facing 20 years of more of the same. Or worse.  <br /><br />Trust me. I've seen the States. It can get worse.]]>
		
		</content:encoded>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 06:09:52 -0100</pubDate>
		<author>rachel_a_briggs@hotmail.co.uk ( Rachel Briggs )</author>
		
		
		
	</item>
	
	 	
	</channel>	 	
</rss>