The politics of public behaviour
This project is a chance to explore the tensions in the current debate between fostering a 'nanny state' and finding a response to some of the most pressing social issues of our time.
"public_behaviour"
40 items tagged with this theme in this project. Find more on this theme : » show items from across the site
- Health strategy to take on obesity | Society | SocietyGuardian.co.uk John Reid (as Health Sec) arguing: "We need to find the right balance, rejecting both the nanny state and the 'Pontius Pilate' state which washes its hands of its citizens' health." from : duncanoleary 11th June 2007
- RSA - Climate change study 80% of people believe they could personally reduce their carbon emissions. 65% think individuals should take responsibility. 21% govt; 11% Big Business. 61% support financially penalising/rewarding people using more/less than the average amount of energy. 22% oppose the idea. 53 would accept limits on their carbon use. 29% wouldn't. The rest don't think there is a problem or don't know. from : duncanoleary 11th June 2007
- Personal Responsibility and Changing Behaviour A good tour of the literature and introduction to key theoretical perspectives on behaviour change and government. Argues role of govt could/should be 'helping people help themselves'. from : duncanoleary 12th June 2007
- Irrational incandescence | Economist.com Article discussing 'apparent irrationality' of people not changing their lightbulbs to (cheaper) energy-saving ones. Suggests: 'One policy option is to decouple the utilities' revenues from the amount of electricity they sell. That gives them an incentive to increase the efficiency of power usage rather than to produce from : duncanoleary 15th June 2007
- The final cut | Economist.com 'Not even 1% of passengers have taken up BA's very reasonably priced offer to offset the carbon emissions of their flights (£5 for London-Madrid, £13.50 for London-Johannesburg). That may be because people are selfish—or it may be because they are rational enough to know that their individual economic choices are not going to make a blind bit of difference to the future of the planet. Nobody is going to save a polar bear by turning off the lights.' from : duncanoleary 15th June 2007
- Don't force me. I'm open to persuasion-Comment - Daniel Finkelstein - 'Not even 1% of passengers have taken up BA's very reasonably priced offer to offset the carbon emissions of their flights (£5 for London-Madrid, £13.50 for London-Johannesburg). That may be because people are selfish—or it may be because they are rational enough to know that their individual economic choices are not going to make a blind bit of difference to the future of the planet. Nobody is going to save a polar bear by turning off the lights.' from : duncanoleary 15th June 2007
- Car wrecks and Hutus: a guide to good conduct - Comment - Daniel Finkelstein Discusses Professor Zimbardo's book 'The Lucifer Effect'. 'Give us peer pressure or the cloak of anonymity or the need to adhere to a consistent philosophy or a group code, give us the right situation and its amazing what we will do, whatever our disposition.' from : duncanoleary 15th June 2007
- Philip G. Zimbardo - Finding Hope in Knowing the Universal Capacity for Evil - New York Times Dr. Zimbardo explains his infamous Stanford Prison Experiment in 1971 in which 23 volunteers were divided randomly into two groups. :“prisoners” and “guards” in a prison environment. The experiment was to run for two weeks...the guards became sadictic within days. from : duncanoleary 15th June 2007
- The Lucifer Effect by Philip Zimbardo Writes: 'Solomon Asch and Muzafer Sherif have shed light on the determinants of conformity. Their research and that of others (Morton Deutsch and Hal Gerard) has demonstrated two main types of conformity: informational and normative.' i.e. we look to others because we don't know what to do, or because we want to fit in. from : duncanoleary 15th June 2007
- Conservative Party Health review Argues for: 'a new Public Health Act designed to deliver separate public health budgets, a stronger Chief Medical Officer's Department, joint appointments of Directors of Public Health between the NHS and local authorities, a cross-government strategy which details actions to be taken by each department to tackle public health challenges, and annual reports by the Treasury on the effect of public expenditure decisions on the delivery of public health objectives.' from : duncanoleary 19th June 2007